From: Lawrence E. Dudek
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 5:24 PM
To: NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Team
Subject: NSTX CSU Project Meeting Notes from 3/03/10
Notes from 3/3 Meeting:

Mangra
Reviewed the possible solutions to reduce the stress in the PF 4 coil and provide shape control in the PF coils.  The plan is to provide spring loaded clamps similar to the current design to provide a force high enough to overcome magnetic forces to keep coils centered through normal operating temperature scenarios.  Requires analysis by EA group to provide spring sizing.
Provided analysis of the deflections of the OTF without the inner link and with the outer ring modified with one end fixed, other end pinned connections.  Indicates that inner ring is not required if compliant link (aka radius rods) are used to carry some of the OOP loads.  

The plan forward:
  1. Support the PF4/5 off the existing PF4,5 supports and use 6 to 12 columns.  
2. More connections from the PF4-5 coils to limit PF 4 stress.  
3. The OTF will be support using the outer ring (1 fixed, 1 pinned end) and compliant links to clevis, which will not be modified.

Zhang
Han presented analysis using one of the larger scenarios, no. 79 on the OTF using the outer ring. Scenario 79: Utheta=2.7mm (0.1”), shear in the epoxy between coil turns is 10.7MPa (1551 psi).  Load in radius rod: 32KN (7.3klbs).  Further work needs to be done with the remaining scenarios but the initial results look good.

Titus
Presented analysis for 6 supports and  6 supports + 6 clamps versions of the PF 4 and 5 coils sets.  Analysis indicates safety factor in Cu is 1.25 (for 6 Supp.) and 1.64 (6 Supp. + 6 clmps).    Layer to Layer Shear Localized Peak in PF4 is 85 MPa for 6 supports, 44 MPa For 6 supports and 6 Clamps and 24 MPa for Twelve Supports.

Sri
Dynamic stresses (from an outer limiter disruption) in the passive plate copper are 90 t0 135 MPa (13 to 20 ksi) and 600 MPa (87 ksi) in the fasteners.  The fasteners will need to be replaced with higher strength fasteners.  

Using the VDE disruption (plasma 1 to plasma 5) stresses in the passive plate brackets are much higher at 2 GPa (290 ksi) which is well beyond conventional materials.  Neumeyer to verify this disruption as a realistic scenario.  The effort to mitigate against this scenario would be significant to severe, possibly requiring a material change of the passive plates.

Ellis
Let a discussion on the potential heating issues from the upgrade on the RF Limiter boron nitride tiles.  While the tiles may increase in temperature and potenitally overheat Menard believes that we may be able to control heating by the plasma to limiter spacing (10-12 cm).  It's not clear at this time that the plasma would have to be run close to the limiter and overheat the tiles.  The decision forward is that no action is required at this time.


Viewgraphs will be posted by B. Simmons

http://nstx-upgrade.pppl.gov/Project_Meetings/CenterStackUpgrade/index_Meetings.htm

Outstanding Action Items (last update 3/4/2010)

Action: WBS Managers provide input for modification of FMEAs ASAP to R. Simmons, cc Neumeyer.

Action: Structural design criteria has a table with likelihood of failures that is in the NSTX (orig.) GRD.  Structural design criteria needs work to be released such as references 
STATUS: Draft out for comment and review

Action: CSU GRD Rev 0 has been approved and is now a controlled doc. The GRD needs to provide the reference to the Design Point link. CN to process the GRD change and Simmons will process the change.  ACTION: Charlie

Action: The idea of a Design Load Requirements (Criteria) Document is a good one. Action: Mark Smith to pull this together for the Structures– Need this BEFORE the PDR

Action:  We have a set of Calculations signed off, but not all were checked for the CDR.  These calcs need to be updated and checked (by PDR?). ACTION: Titus

Action: Neumeyer to comment on VDE plasma disruption used to analyze the stresses in the PP brackets and fasteners.  Is it a realistic scenario disruption?

________________

Larry